View my Guestbook
Free Guestbooks by Bravenet.com

America's Anti-Militarist Tradition

    The right wing went apoplectic at the skepticism that greeted Gen. David Petraeus’s recent testimony about the alleged success of the military escalation in Iraq. It was as though a member of the military was incapable of engaging in spin to support his commander in chief’s war policy. President Bush summed up this attitude revealingly when he said it was one thing to attack him, but quite another to question General Petraeus. War, Clausewitz noted, is politics by other means. That makes high-ranking generals a species of politician. Not a few have harbored presidential thoughts, and some have made it. It is said that Petraeus would like to be another. These are the people the pro-war conservatives are willing to trust implicitly? (Anti-war members of the armed forces, on the other hand, are, in Rush Limbaugh’s words, “phony soldiers.”)
To read the full story go HERE

While this is not my opinion I thought that it should be shared.
Cheerily
IJK


Leave a Comment

Untitled Comment

Posted on October 16, 2007 at 10:59 PM by Bubba
Honestly, IJK, I tend to trust Gen. Murtha for opinions regarding the sensibilities of the Iraq War. As a veteran of an unpopular war (as I know you are, too), I tend to respect generals who are willing to tell the truth, no matter where it leads rather than pandering to an iconclastic viewpoint entrenched in the politics of the right-wing-- the blind, 'follow at all costs and keep your mouth shut', 'we're the patriots and you're not' divisiveness that got us into the mess in which we're currently permanently embroiled.

Is there no room left anywhere in this country for a warrior or ex-warrior capable of discerning that we're headed down the wrong road in quest of an unwinnable cause?